By Sherman Dorn

To appreciate the present second in class responsibility, one needs to comprehend the bigger contradictions in schooling politics. responsibility Frankenstein offers a broader standpoint at the university responsibility debate by way of exploring the contradictions inherent in high-stakes trying out. responsibility Frankenstein explains the historic and social origins of test-based responsibility: the political roots of responsibility, why we belief attempt ratings whereas we mistrust academics, the assumptions at the back of formulaic responsibility platforms, and the weaknesses with the present carrot-and-stick method of motivating academics. responsibility Frankenstein solutions the questions of educators and fogeys who are looking to comprehend the origins of responsibility. This booklet demanding situations the ideals of fierce advocates and competitors of highstakes checking out. It offers a rescue plan for responsibility after the mess ups of high-stakes checking out, a plan to make responsibility shrewdpermanent, democratic, and actual.

Show description

Read Online or Download Accountability Frankenstein. Understanding and Taming the Monster PDF

Best assessment books

Download PDF by Judith Milner, Patrick O'Byrne: Assessment and Counselling: Theory, Process and

While evaluation has lengthy been imperative to the counselling strategy, with the new strikes in the direction of evidence-based perform and elevated law it's taking an more and more pivotal position in provider provision. this crucial new textual content is helping make clear the character and function of review in counselling.

Read e-book online Disaster Risk Assessment and Mitigation: Arrival of Tsunami PDF

After fresh earthquakes, tsunamis, and hurricanes devastated greater than a dozen nations, civil engineers locate themselves on the vanguard of creating and repairing the infrastructure of destroyed groups. A stability needs to be struck among capability losses from average failures and fiscal commitments to infrastructure security.

Kristen M. Meiburger's Quantitative Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging for the PDF

This publication describes the improvement of quantitative ideas for ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging within the evaluate of architectural and vascular parameters. It provides morphological vascular learn in accordance with the improvement of quantitative imaging recommendations for using medical B-mode ultrasound photos, and preclinical architectural vascular investigations on quantitative imaging recommendations for ultrasounds and photoacoustics.

Additional resources for Accountability Frankenstein. Understanding and Taming the Monster

Sample text

No one clamors for high-stakes tests in psychology, anthropology, or philosophy, let alone fields such as environmental studies that we generally consider interdisciplinary, in large part because those are not shared memories for adults. We generally do remember taking (or suffering through) the classes that are most frequently tested. We also remember taking tests, many tests, of all kinds. We remember grades. We remember being ranked, being judged by our academic performance, and having future opportunities determined by tests and grades (Dreeben, 1968).

For children, however, a year of being with an incompetent teacher can be extremely destructive. The problem is partly one of inappropriate time scales. Annual tests are too infrequent for appropriate guidance of instruction or evaluation of teaching, while they are too frequent to measure broader changes in schools. The power of test scores to narrow discussion over education policy is not absolute, certainly. One can point to several topics of debate recently that are not necessarily tied to accountability or test scores: teacher qualifications, publicly-funded prekindergarten, class sizes, the teaching of evolution, vouchers, charter schools, and so forth.

Robert Kennedy’s push for testing became the starting point for additional efforts to keep Title I programs accountable. From 1976 through the 1990s, the most common use of tests in Title I came through a manipulation of standardized test scores called the normal curve equivalent, which some hoped would put different tests on an identical scale (RMC Research Corporation, 1976). The use of normal-curve equivalents became the standard tool in the evaluation of Title I and other povertyrelated programs, sometimes to the consternation of observers who debated the methodological, use, and political issues involved (Barnes & Ginsburg, 1979; Linn, 1979; Stonehill & Groves, 1983; vanderPloeg, 1982; Vinovskis, 1999).

Download PDF sample

Accountability Frankenstein. Understanding and Taming the Monster by Sherman Dorn


by Donald
4.0

Rated 4.35 of 5 – based on 32 votes